The dilution of Government Trust

Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Lecturer Faculty of Law and Laboratory Staf of Law Faculty of Law University of Malang

Election 2009 is a celebration of democracy that both in the past 10 years of successful reform of the president-elect Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY), many political appointments in the Campaign. But that promise did not seem to exist in its implementation which substantib both showcased in the idea of development and tactical program president. In the national news media that the government salasatu SBY at this time only make promises like sweet honey. Government and political direction can not be stabilized towards a better community development, although some programs such terbangkalai promise of cheap public housing, memurah meriahkan fuel, maintaining national order and provide prosperity to the small people. But what is happening is this is in disregard to put forward issues and rusheffel coalition government, instead of political disputes is a major factor for menumbalkan people in political farce. Not to mention the tax issue and the bank century very much harm the State and the people themselves. Members of the legislature (parliament) would rather get stuck in counting chairs and a coalition of political slapstick in talking about policies for the welfare of its people. The party cadres would rather fight for political office for personal gain and his group so that the mainstreaming of people's welfare policy becomes stagnant and does not run.
Behavior of leaders in government and this country a lot that should be strived for in the alignment, because the people themselves are dependent on the split personality of the leaders of this country, for example on the compass poll results (17 January 2011) that satisfaction with the performance of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY ie 28.6% of economic factors, social welfare is only 32, 4%, political and legal security of 39.6% and 24.5%. This is only a proud achievement as well as lethal factor SBY and economic welfare of the people. So therefore, trust in the government of SBY is very faded because caused by political promises that are not in politics realisasikan.kepentingan very large coalition of promoting professionalism in politics in memikirkasn pro-people policies. But it seems to be in a vacuum chamber for the move by this government. Various issues that arise as people riot church arson, assault komonitas Ahmadiyah in Pandeglang Cikeusik, this can not be separated from the role of the state who tried to provoke all the components to create unrest, despite government's goal to sterilize all of interfaith leaders in maneuvering criticism of the government , because that SBY's administration lied to the people in the stamp of his political promises during the campaign. The erosion of trust of the people against its government is a culmination of unrest the people themselves. Although the nerve center of government policy has been damaged and much influenced by foreign interests that hope will grow the development of public welfare could no longer be together in the spirit of the commonwealth countries, but this country is still a lot of potential resources that can be in national governance to be made in joint assets good for increasing the level of the rate of economic and basic needs of its people.
The politicians, party leaders, government and economic observers are not really coordinated in one direction in order to achieve prosperity and peace as in amanahkan by the 1945 Constitution. From election to election again, no job substantib and happy hearts of the people, but that very many arise to the surface is the political attitude and a very minimal government Cultur reponnya to the problems faced by its own people. With kelunturan trus (trust) the government, of course add further misery to the people in this country think about the leader who always liked ngumbar Animashaun in and talk to the imagery itself, very fair at all if the people of Indonesia said in a script that just spit election promises and policies lie. The issue continues to occur, the case of Gaius to petty corruption becomes the central political dynamics that waste energy that is not useful at all. In fact it is the people who bear all the implications and once again the people who made in the political casualties of. The executive power in this country in the busy by the phenomenon and discourse rusheffel cabinet which resulted in the blockage of the aspiration of the people who need help from the government. In the middle of busy traffic jam of vehicles, buses, puso basic food and other carriers in the harbor peacock offerings that can reach 4 kilo meters long jams, the visit of the minister one to the other ministers there was no significant change can seek solutions to congestion at the port of peacock offerings. Congestion is also inspired jamming on the cabinet to provide services to the people and clog valves welfare state against their constituents as well. It should if this government really wants to provide a solution to the congestion that exists, then the government also must dare to make a bridge construction mangrove habitation between Java and Sumatra straits, with the aim to maximize economic peredaran people for the better and more efficient. Actually it is in desperate need of policies that are very fast and adequate to support the needs of the people of Indonesia for a whole country into a strong and strategic country in a global context, but sometimes our leaders dare to speak but was unable to run, that's the character of this nation's leadership. So therefore, this namgsa bissawab huwallah hualam not know the direction where?.
Before the Cabinet reshuffle should be the first review and consider the good and true. Because the cabinet reshuffle is vital in a State, because the cabinet that the loading could have been better than replacing a cabinet. If only like it then it will happen miskomonikasi policies that ultimately will harm its own people. Or disassemble the cabinet reshuffle is not the appropriate solution and will not achieve its goals as well, actually that should be appointed by the president should add the coordinator of all ministers who can be named Prime Minister in order to maximize welfare policies toward the people, this should be done by the president or future government.

Tinuk Dwi Cahyani is Lecturer at the Faculty of Law University of Malang and Laboratory Staff of Law Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang